https://t.co/bjes7WlDL8

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 25, 2020

https://t.co/8Ut90EClRr

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 25, 2020

https://t.co/jBr7X4AKZd

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 25, 2020

via GIPHY

Moduloft #COP26 presentation, Carbon accounting Finance and First Time Buyers.https://t.co/bjes7WlDL8

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 24, 2020

Bankers and Skin in the Game? Taleb continued And Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Ezra Pound and Lord Byron? https://t.co/bnOBlWQr5G via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 24, 2020

Energy Economics, Energy, Statistical Turn in Physics, Atomism, Reductionism, Club of Rome. Claes Johnson, Steinmetz, IronSide, Maxwell. Electronic Universe, Alfven, Hoyle, Wolfram Computation, Applied Maths. Idiotic Climate Change Communicators https://t.co/7RfCV8M4Yj

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 24, 2020

Hope without an object cannot live. This Land is Mine, Henry George and the Single Land Tax https://t.co/T72U5SC8XU via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 24, 2020

Economists, Apologists and Sophists for Usury. Positive Money sells out to Bankers? Or Donald Wheres ya Trousers. https://t.co/RN1q1yNUZl via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 24, 2020

http://positivemoney.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Decarbonisation-of-the-UK-Economy-and-Green-Finance-inquiry_-Positive-Money-submission-1.pdf

Limits of the Intellectual Left. So Says Leftist Auto Didact. MAGA #CHomskyWrong #VarafoukisWrong https://t.co/9h3B6wNvhx via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 24, 2020

15. Remember that you must behave in life as at a dinner party. Is anything brought around to you? Put out your hand and take your share with moderation. Does it pass by you? Don't stop it. Is it not yet come? Don't stretch your desire towards it, but wait till it reaches you. Do this with regard to children, to a wife, to public posts, to riches, and you will eventually be a worthy partner of the feasts of the gods. And if you don't even take the things which are set before you, but are able even to reject them, then you will not only be a partner at the feasts of the gods, but also of their empire. For, by doing this, Diogenes, Heraclitus and others like them, deservedly became, and were called, divine. http://classics.mit.edu/Epictetus/epicench.html

Just by way of explanation by Profession I am a Chartered Surveyor and Valuer. I began my Career at Shell UK Limited where I was involved in the Tax Assessment of the St Fergus Gas Terminal in Peterhead. To Tax large oil industry plant and machinery open market valuations of Property Value based on open market transactions do not exist as for Property Rateable values based upon rentals. As Open market comparables do not exist, to calculate a property value for taxation purposes for large Capital Plant, a Valuation Technique called the contractors principle of Valuation is employed. The Contractors Principle of Valuation is a residual method of valuation which adds up all the qualifying input costs and then applies a discount rate to generate an annual economic rent, ( Net Present Value ) which can then be used to calculate the rating assessment. At Shell I did hundreds of these types of Valuations and the Largest such valuation was for the St Fergus Gas Terminal.( In excess of £300 million in the mid 1980's) Concepts such as Embodied energy also feed nicely back into measures of Levelized costs of electricity. Pulling these concepts of energy value as opposed to financial value into the equations should hopefully result in seeing what the problem we are trying to solve is?

Do we want to save Society or the financial system as it currently operates?

Discount rates based upon the cost of Capital are pretty subjective , but it seems to me, that EROIE measures Levelised costs of Electricity production and so forth and a residual valuation approach can yield a good method by which to assess the Economic potential for future prosperity based upon access to energy. Energy and Capital are very different things. The best description of this dichotomy I have encountered is this from Carol Quigley in Tragedy and Hope, ”Thus, clearly, money and goods are not the same thing but are, on the contrary, exactly opposite things. Most confusion in economic thinking arises from a failure to recognize this fact. Goods are wealth which you have, while money is a claim on wealth which you do not have. Thus goods are an asset; money is a debt. If goods are wealth; money is not wealth, or negative wealth, or even anti-wealth. They always behave in opposite ways, just as they usually move in opposite directions. If the value of one goes up, the value of the other goes down, and in the same proportion.” Quigley Tragedy and hope. Energy and Money are different. REDEFINING FISCAL CONSERVATISM. THE TERRA/ENERGY BASED FISCAL UNIT. FÖRES AND LAGOM WHITE PAPER, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR A FISCAL CONSERVATISM BASED UPON CIRCULAR ECONOMICS. PART ONE SCOPE. ⨊Före(s) The store of Value component of the föres, Lagom dynamic currency complex. The first two articles demonstrate a mistake in Logic engendered by treating energy assets as a Debt Based Financial Asset, Energy is either there or not there once you have nothing there is nothing you can not have less than no energy. Therefore any stock of energy must always be positive although if one adopts the Energy Cost of Energy measure, you may need to use more accessible Energy to extract untapped energy. On the Energy Returned on Energy invested Curve the current state of the art for this concept looks like this. http://euanmearns.com/eroei-for-beginners/ Energy Cost of Energy is explained here by Dr Tim Morgan.

SEEDS uses an alternative measure, ECoE (the Energy Cost of Energy), which expresses cost as a percentage of the gross energy accessed.Because the world economy is a closed system, ECoE is not directly analogous to ‘cost’ in the usual financial sense. Rather, it is an economic rent, limiting the choice we exercise over any given quantity of energy. If we have 100 units of energy, and the ECoE is 5%, we exercise choice (or ‘discretion’) over 95 units. If ECoE rises to 10%, we now have discretion over only 90 units, even though the gross amount remains 100.This is loosely analogous to personal prosperity. If someone’s income remains the same, but the cost of essentials rises, that person is worse off, even though income itself hasn’t changed. Understanding ECoEECoE evolves over time. In the early stages of any given resource, ECoE is driven downwards by geographic reach, and by economies of scale. Once maturity is reached, depletion takes over as the driver, pushing ECoE upwards. In the pre-maturity phase, technology accelerates the fall in ECoE driven by reach and scale. Post-maturity, technology acts to mitigate the rise caused by depletion. But – and this is often misunderstood – the capabilities of technology are limited to the envelope of the physical characteristics of the resource.

https://www.genfound.org/media/1374/pdf-generation-foundation-stranded-carbon-assets-v1.pdf ‘Carbon bubble’ coming that could wipe trillions from the global economy Demand for fossil fuels will decline in the near future with major macroeconomic and geopolitical consequences Date: June 4, 2018 Source: Radboud University Nijmegen Divestment and creative destruction The process of transition towards a low-carbon economy is now becoming inevitable, as policies supporting this change have been developed and gradually implemented for some time. “New efficiency standards imply that we do more with the same amounts of energy, as older, less efficient technologies are gradually phased out. The transition is therefore irreversible; however its pace can vary according to whether and how new climate policies are implemented.” The scientists conclude that further economic damage from a potential bubble burst could be avoided by decarbonising early. “Divestment is a prudential thing to do. We should be carefully looking at where we are investing our money.(1) For instance, much like companies, pension funds and other institutions currently invest in fossil-fuel assets. Following recommendations from central banks, commercial banks are increasingly looking at the financial risks of stranded fossil-fuel assets, even though their possible impacts have not yet been fully determined. Until now, observers mostly paid attention to the likely effectiveness of climate policies, but not to the ongoing and effectively irreversible technological transition. This level of ‘creative destruction’ appears inevitable now and must be carefully managed,” Mercure concludes.

(1)ED. This is the key misunderstanding, the whole basis of this analysis should look at Net Energy Surplus over cost of energy extraction, then in a real sense the Sentance , “We should be carefully looking at where we are investing our Energy ( qua, Energy )”, would have money taking the Debt based monetary unit as a referent renders the statement meaningless a per pro-energy capital allocation decisions.

Story Source: Materials provided by Radboud University Nijmegen. Note: Content may be edited for style and length. Journal Reference: J.-F. Mercure, H. Pollitt, J. E. Viñuales, N. R. Edwards, P. B. Holden, U. Chewpreecha, P. Salas, I. Sognnaes, A. Lam, F. Knobloch. Macroeconomic impact of stranded fossil fuel assets. Nature Climate Change, 2018; DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0182-1 Here is a Graph of World energy use in terms of TerraWatt Hours, My own analysis and synthesis of the World Debt Money economy and the world Energy economy is given below. I must say the Financial economy serves only one purpose and that is a one-time conversion reference point for explanatory purposes. The Financial System based on debt will, in time be recognised as and studied as an artefact of late-stage financialised Capitalism. Energy Cost of Energy, makes much more sense and tracking real energy wealth and prosperity if Tims hypothesis is correct, that Energy is the driver of prosperity, which I think he is, will see an energy-based unit of accounting for currencies adopted as a better standard or referent for Capital allocation decisions. https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/global-fossil-fuel-consumption Embodied energy cost of opportunity cost. Which would be a true metric of decision making where resource constraints involve mutually exclusive investment decisions. Debt in Energy terms would be borrowing future Energy and using it up so that it is not available in the future In a very great sense this Energy Future Budget is Unknown. We have Proven Reserves and so forth and existing known Generating and refining and conversion capacities but until a sensible measure of debt based upon known future energy resources and their rate of use are coupled with ideas of a Unit of Debt, in the sense of Using future supplies or reserves Now instead of at some point in the future the Notions of Debt in financial terms are meaningless. We do Know that all Debts and Credits do not sum to Zero in the existing system and this is due to the Principal Debt being issued without the Interest Element , it is from this simple fact that Money Scarcity exists as an idea and gives a notion then of a Time value of money expressed as a rate of Interest. GLOBAL PRIMARY ENERGY USE ASSOCIATED WITH PRODUCTION, CONSUMPTION AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE 15% of the energy use embodied in trade turns out to be induced by final consumption, and 85% is attributed to intermediate production https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320445428_Global_primary_energy_use_associated_with_production_consumption_and_international_trade I have spent a Week Assembling Data available through public API’s so that I can build a model of World Economy based upon Energy Generation and Energy Consumption. Most of all of that has already been done what has not been done is creating a Money that embodies embodied energy as its objective valuation basis, The Value basis of money is subjective and as a subjective phenomenon is also a variable. A Bugbear expressed and repeated in the pages of this Blog more than once. http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/08/renewableseroi-why-money-doesnt-cut-it.html Introduction to Technocracy – 1933 https://archive.org/details/introductiontotec00tech discussions — of ‘value,’ of fluctuating prices, of the gold standard, of changing interest rates, of items of pecuniary wealth which are at the same time items of debt — are merely discussions looking toward a readjustment of the factors which prevent them The problem of analysing political choices against the metric of a Monetary measure is the Money as a Thing is most certainly a Variable and as any good technologist, scientist or metrologist will tell you a unit of measurement has to be clearly defined and fixed. The dollar. He notes that it is a variable. Why anyone should attempt, on this earth, to use a variable as a measuring rod is so utterly absurd that he dismisses any serious consideration of its use in his study of what should be done. He also considers ‘price’ and ‘value’ and the fine- spun theories of philosophers and economists who have attempted to surround these terms with the semblance of meaning. These terms, like the monetary unit, may have had meaning to men in the past but they mean nothing whatsoever to the modern technologist. The standard of measurement is not relevant to the things measured; and the measuring rod and the things, measured as if they were stable, are all variables. This comparison of different energy solution uses ERIO https://festkoerper-kernphysik.de/Weissbach_EROI_preprint.pdf Abstract The Energy Returned on Invested, EROI, has been evaluated for typical power plants representing wind energy, photovoltaics, solar thermal, hydro, natural gas, biogas, coal and nuclear power. The strict exergy concept with no ”primary energy weighting”, updated material databases, and updated technical procedures make it possible to directly compare the overall efficiency of those power plants on a uniform mathematical and physical basis. Pump storage systems, needed for solar and wind energy, have been included in the EROI so that the efficiency can be compared with an ”unbuffered” scenario. The results show that nuclear, hydro, coal, and natural gas power systems (in this order) are one order of magnitude more effective than photovoltaics and wind power. http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2017/09/money-does-not-initiate-economic.html Click the Link Below and please read this book, written by a Physicist, Engineer and sadly now departed all round good egg Prof. Sir David MacKay. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_J._C._MacKay Sustainable Energy - without the hot air Sustainable Energy – without the hot airby David MacKay http://www.withouthotair.com/Contents.html International Trade is relevant, the relevance economically is relevant at the EROI embodied energy level though. Money in International Trade is a Convenient Posit ( Quine)(1) What is important regarding that is that the receipt of currency can be exchanged for something tangible, the money receive is not an end in itself. Looked at in EROEI and embodied energy terms it actually makes your point crystal clear. That said its pretty clear to those who are objectively considering the point. (1)P.41 para 2. http://letthemconfectsweeterlies.blogspot.se/2018/03/energy-returned-on-energy-invested.html https://surplusenergyeconomics.wordpress.com/2017/04/14/93-the-prosperity-equation/ MMT’s ignorance of economic thought, May 24 at 11:10am Bill Mitchell has a new post “A surplus of trade discussions” responding to some of the criticisms of the MMT position on trade deficits (though he didn’t link to any of them, including my post “Some Preliminary Questions for MMT“). He opens with the proposition that “exports are a cost and imports are a benefit”, and reaches the following conclusion:

When it comes to trade, MMT focuses, initially on the real layer of the analysis.Thus it is undeniable (and I am surprised to read all those who are torturing themselves trying to deny it) – exports are a cost and imports are a benefit. Giving some real thing away is a cost. Getting some real thing is a benefit.That doesn’t equate, as I have been reading the last few weeks, in a conclusion that MMT’s preference is for a nation to have a current account deficit. It just states the obvious fact that exports, by definition, involve sacrificing real resources and depriving a nation of their use. Imports on the other hand clearly involve receiving final goods and services where the real resource sacrifice has been made by the exporting nation. In a world where we produce to consume – not for its own sake – then receiving goods and services is better (real terms) than sending them elsewhere.

Steve Keen Responds.

Since I was one of the ones denying Mitchell’s opening gambit—though there must have been other people “torturing themselves”, since all I noted in my post was that I disputed it as a premise—I had better reply now on this issue.I do not deny the proposition that “Giving some real thing away is a cost. Getting some real thing is a benefit”: that’s obvious in a materialist world. What I do deny is that this proposition has any relevance to either macroeconomics or trade theory. And I am not the first one to deny this: that honour goes to Karl Marx.This raises one of my major issues with MMT: advocates know their own economic logic very well, but they seem to have little knowledge of compatible precursors to their views (or even compatible contemporaries, like complexity theory). Consequently, whether they realise it or not, they often end up making arguments that would be right at home in a conventional Neoclassical textbook. These arguments are just as wrong in MMT hands as they are in Neoclassical ones.This “exports=cost, imports=benefit” MMT analysis of international trade is a classic case in point. There are at least three ways in which this MMT perspective is a backward step in relation to preceding enlightened work in economics: Standard Neoclassical work on the irrelevance of opportunity cost below full employment Marx’s arguments on the irrelevance of the seller’s utility in trade The extensive Post Keynesian research on declining marginal costs of production and economies of scale.

INAPPLICABILITY OF OPPORTUNITY COST EXCEPT AT FULL EMPLOYMENT

Embodied energy cost of opportunity cost. Which would be a true metric of decision making where resource constraints involve mutually exclusive investment decisions.

INAPPLICABILITY OF OPPORTUNITY COST EXCEPT AT FULL EMPLOYMENT

End of Ownership, Circular Economy Proof of Brain and Primary, Intermediary and Consumption Energy Tokens. A Framework Evolves.

POST NAVIGATION

Here is my Working Draft spreadsheet for the synthesis of the Energy Production of the world in kilowatt-hours and the Debt Based world Financial economy based upon local dollar parity currency exchange rate basis from the CIA World Fact Book.

Do Americans Know How Weird and Extreme Their Collapse is Getting?

Even the Dark Ages Would Laugh at Where We’re Going

#TheExergist

Exergy

In thermodynamics, the exergy of a system is the maximum useful work possible during a process that brings the system into equilibrium with a heat reservoir, reaching maximum entropy.^[1] When the surroundings are the reservoir, exergy is the potential of a system to cause a change as it achieves equilibrium with its environment. Exergy is the energy that is available to be used. After the system and surroundings reach equilibrium, the exergy is zero. Determining exergy was also the first goal of thermodynamics. The term "exergy" was coined in 1956 by Zoran Rant (1904–1972) by using the Greek ex and ergon meaning "from work"^[1][3], but the concept was developed by J. Willard Gibbs in 1873.^[4] Energy is neither created nor destroyed during a process. Energy changes from one form to another (see First Law of Thermodynamics). In contrast, exergy is always destroyed when a process is irreversible, for example loss of heat to the environment (see Second Law of Thermodynamics). This destruction is proportional to the entropy increase of the system together with its surroundings (see Entropy production). The destroyed exergy has been called anergy.^[2] For an isothermal process, exergy and energy are interchangeable terms, and there is no anergy.

Energy Economy, Renewables including Nuclear. https://t.co/75ouILeSAY via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 24, 2020

On Debt Jubilees, The religious Language of Debt Forgiveness @GrubStreetJournal #Quanta @Wiki_Ballot https://t.co/zHMC2RiSFY via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 24, 2020

Statue of Theophrastus, Palermo Botanical Garden The Oligarchical temper, Theophrastus

The Oligarchical temper would seem to consist in a love of authority, covetous, not of gain, but of power. The Oligarch is one who, when the people are deliberating whom they shall associate with the archon as joint directors of the procession, will come forward and express his opinion that these directors ought to have plenary powers; and, if others propose ten, he will say that ‘one is sufficient,’ but that ‘he must be a man.’. Of Homer’s poetry, he has mastered only this line, — No good comes of a manifold rule; let the ruler be one: of the rest, he is absolutely ignorant.

http://www.eudaemonist.com/biblion/characters/ John you might enjoy this from this chap. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theophrastus c. 371 – c. 287 BC XXVI. The Oligarch (xxix) On the 29th of february I made this post of Notes for later.

EMBODIED ENERGY MATERIALS PASSPORTS OPPORTUNITY COST. NOTES. FOR LATER.

Embodied energy Materials passports Opportunity cost. Notes. For later. https://t.co/zPcQrl4bwt via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 23, 2020

The Modern Monetary Theory ( Stalinist/Fascists) are really pushing their poison and they mean to Cull the Human Race with their misanthropic elitist dogmas. All Hail Ehrlich and the Mann/Hansen/Schmidt disciples of Agenda21/30. https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/?s=MMT+ In our requirements for prosperity and more energy production, we need to take heed of the Late Prof. Sir David McKay “”Every Big Helps” https://www.withouthotair.com/ Liberty Loving Human beings are under attack, make no mistake it is an attack on several fronts and all patriotic, family-loving god fearing and right-minded people must understand we need a resolution to our own Byzantine Generals dilemma. Articles such as this only serve to muddy the waters, Large FInance Capital and Big Corporations and the State are all one and the same subsidiaries of the Oligarchy. And guess what The Oligarchy isn’t really into us unless it is stealing the sweat off our brows or exploiting our nearest and dearest to satisfy its own depravity. https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2019/03/26/eats-shites-and-leaves-brexit-brexit-brino-eumilitaryunification-what-about-the-military-industrial-complex/

Strong Stuff , you may well say that and the onus of proof rests with us at #Moduloft to advocate for our Customers wishing to become stakeholders within the UK's Homeowning, Stakeholder democracy.

Glamorous flashing city lightsSuburbia within commute of higherDreams. A stairway to real Estate heaven.The only Ladder, oh to be upon the bottom rung and rise.Dreams for mortgage, no hostage to Fortune.Sophistication often masques ignorance. The humble and rustic often belies an appreciation of what truly is.

DOn't just take my word for it, here is Per Kurowski an Executive Director #WorldBank #BancoMundial from 2002 – 2004 Wednesday, October 28, 2015 UN, World Bank, IMF, and NGO’s: Give the SDGs a fair chance. Kick out Basel Committee’s bank regulations The Sustainable Development Goals seem all very laudable, but given that bank credit is one of the most important financial resources, in order for these to stand a fair chance of being met, one would have to kick out all current bank regulators… or at least their regulatory pillar, the credit risk weighted capital requirements for banks. Hear me out! Big Question no1.

1. What are we re-setting and Why?

The Natural Order of Money and Why Abstract Currencies Fail and a Unit of account for the people. https://t.co/n4Mnnn2XOy via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 23, 2020

the PoSitive Money quiz Written and developed by David Faraday https://t.co/aRUQ8NjyGv #quiz

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 23, 2020

Tales from Mount Incomprehension. #CircularEconomy #EnergyEconomy #TulletandPrebon #DrTimMorgan #SEEDS #EmboddiedEnergy #MaterialsPassports #PropTech @wiki_ballot @GrubStreetJorno @Survation @wiki_ballot @financialeyes #WIKIBALLOTPICK @JoeBlob20 https://t.co/7J0aFImPkg

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 23, 2020

"quod erat demonstrandum", Doubling Back to make sense of the doubling down, Double Speak and Double Plus Good, Beware Thought Crime ahead! https://t.co/A3aampt99K via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 23, 2020

POSSIBILIST PERSPECTIVE ON POST GROWTH, SUSTAINABLE MONEY AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY. WHO’S REALITY.

Possibilist perspective on Post Growth, Sustainable Money and Sustainable Energy. Who's Reality. https://t.co/qFy1pz9e94 via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 23, 2020

Money does not initiate Economic activity, in all cases, it is an intermediary token or rain check https://t.co/VFRKtc6A1e via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 23, 2020

Money does not initiate Economic activity, in all cases, it is an intermediary token or rain check which has profound effects on social relations and commerce between individuals and nations, but money is a mere Idea and can be anything we imagine it to be.

Embodied energy and carbon – The ICE database Embodied energy is the amount of energy consumed to extract, refine, process, transport and fabricate a material or product (including buildings). It is often measured from cradle to (factory) gate, cradle to site (of use), or cradle to grave (end of life). Likewise, embodied carbon footprint is the amount of carbon (CO2 or CO2e emission) to produce a material. Embodied energy and carbon is a topic of rising importance. In fact, it is normally possible to reduce the embodied energy and carbon of a building or construction project by 10-20% without adding to the build cost. What’s more embodied carbon is often 20-50%, or so, of the whole life energy and carbon of a building, i.e. when operational carbon emissions are considered. The embodied energy and carbon life cycle of a building can be expressed on a single diagram, as below. https://www.ice.org.uk/knowledge-and-resources/briefing-sheet/embodied-energy-and-carbon https://www.yourhome.gov.au/materials/embodied-energy https://www.archdaily.com/931249/embodied-energy-in-building-materials-what-it-is-and-how-to-calculate-it https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Embodied_energy_in_construction http://clarityenv.com.au/envest/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYfrDLu8kw4

#Wasssupppp Putting it all together, Energy, Debt, War, Sanctions, Elitism, Money Money Money. #Trump #Hall #EROI #EmboddiedEnergy #CircularEconomy https://t.co/KFujFcqpo9 via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 23, 2020

Global Building Information Modelling (BIM) and Digital Twin Market Opportunities in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Industry, 2020-2026 https://t.co/rLDjwcDcW0

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 23, 2020

This is part of the Sustainable development Goals , FInance and the Built environment series . Focusing on the emerging residential mortgage market with particular emphasis on the Volume budget homes and First time Markets of the UK.

In Part 2

In part 2, we looked at Mark Carney's new role as set out in the Guardian in december 2019 and consider these statements with the Great Reset narratives coming from the World economic Forum and previous papers on World Reserve Currency reform from after the Global Financial Crisis. And Also going back further to the Nixon Shock, when Connolly famously said Its our Currency but your problem and Degaulle famously quipped. La réforme, oui. La chien-lit, non ! In Part 1 https://www.yumpu.com/s/H8n64zmFkLTPGMRN we had this as our primer statement. Following the second Lockdown and the huge QE bail outs ostensibly for Main Street but largely for massive concentration of Corporate Wealth and control , this booklet gives a framework of how free markets and market led credit based distributed sovereign money is the way to build back better. The present course led by Mark Carney throws the main street baby out with the Surveillance Capitalism #4IR Bath Water. “LA RÉFORME OUI, LA CHIENLIT NON” https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2019/12/10/la-reforme-oui-la-chienlit-non-degaulle-macron-trump-nixon-xi-jinping-mao-zedong-the-exorbitant-privilege-dont-let-boris-shit-the-nhs-bed-with-his-reheated-may-brino/ This is a summary of and response to the New Horizons WEF session from november 10th. Mark Carney is the Keynote and there are also contributions from Christine Lagarde and Andrew Bailey. Moduloft is committed to the Entry Level budget homeownership Market. Delivering affordable Homes and the means to Finance them literally without costing the earth. Moduloft is Green by design, and Affordable by design , we are experts in materials passports, Energy based economics and Placemaking. We do have questions though; regarding the Agenda 2030 sustainable development goals, and whether financial products are being developed for our Customer price point? This coming week we will publish a series of discussion papers surrounding this question:

Is 21st Century Britain, in 2021, going to be a Home Owning democracy or, a Rent seeking Banana Republic?

Carbon emissions and the building and construction industry along with heating , cooling and lighting of the built environment are large emitters of CO2 and users of energy. As such Embodied energy, Embodied Carbon and finance linked to embodied carbon or Carbon emissions reporting, are especially relevant to charting a course for our future business planning at Moduloft. Follow the money, The green New Deal sustainable development goals , Planning policy, Land Value capture. Why the UN do not want people to own their own home and achieve financial independence. https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2020/11/22/green-horizons-ngfs-gisd-tvsm-carbon-credits-and-the-uk-mortgage-market-implications-of-sdgs-to-home-owning-democracy-a-moduloft-inquiry/ Climate Communication, Covid Communication, The emperors new clothes and Peter and the wolf aspects of Catastrophe based policy narratives. https://twitter.com/elleprovocateur http://www.theartofannihilation.com/ http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/01/17/the-manufacturing-of-greta-thunberg-for-consent-the-political-economy-of-the-non-profit-industrial-complex/

Green Horizons, #NGFS #GISD #TVSM Carbon Credits and the UK Mortgage Market, Implications of SDG's to Home owning democracy. A #Moduloft inquiry. #WrongKindofGreen https://t.co/Cibb04YSON via @rld_real_CPR

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 22, 2020

Are we a Home Owning Democracy or a Rent Seeking Banana Republic. #PlaceMakingBasics #RealRLD Westferry Printworks and Friary Park Acton Compared. #LoftMiles #AffordableBasics @EMPTYHOMES https://t.co/wSputho1fU pic.twitter.com/AgDF7KOBv6

— RealRLD (@rld_real_CPR) November 21, 2020